How to write a critical essay


Of all the types of journalism, criticism is the one that damages the karma of the author the most. In common parlance, the word “criticize” means “reproach” and “critic” means one who finds everything terrible. Scientific, literary, theatrical, film, food and any other criticism is a way of examining an object from different angles, both conditionally bad and conditionally good. The critic doesn’t have to be bad, and their writing doesn’t have to morally stifle and discourage creativity. Also, critical documents can be written by anyone who can write. You have to concentrate, choose a role and a position, formulate arguments, etc.

Sometimes writing such texts can be difficult: the lack of time, motivation or poor preparation is always visible in the quality of the text that the reader receives from the author. In this case, you can simply Google “try it for me by Writance” and select the desired section in the search engine.

Why criticism is necessary

Criticism is vital for the creative industries. It helps creators create better, sellers sell better, and consumers understand what they are consuming.

If you watched the cartoon “Ratatouille”, you remember the fearsome food critic Ego. Just thinking about it, the restaurateur shivers with terror. When Ego enters the room, everyone freezes. What the critic will write in his column will depend on his taste for food. A negative review is a death sentence for a restaurant. A positive is a lucky ticket.

This cartoon hyperbole about the cook rat didn’t appear in an empty place. In countries where the media sphere is developed, criticism is an important institution. It helps people find out what’s good and what’s not; to decide what is and what is not worth expending time, money and emotions; compare their impressions with the impressions of an intelligent person. Critics’ findings affect consumption. From then on, the young restorer could not neglect the future Ego column.

The reputation of the reviewer and the media publishing it ensures that the professional review will not be replaced by hidden advertising. Reputation cannot be bought, cannot be sold, is easily lost and very difficult to restore. Therefore, the restaurant owner is not trying to bribe Ego or any other reviewer to write a positive review.

Ego is an unsympathetic character, hostile to the restaurant owner and wielding power. However, he approves of the dish he tasted – if it was good. Of course, consumers don’t view the review as the only guide, and the reviewer’s impressions may not be in sync with everyone else’s impressions. However, by regularly calling it bittersweet, boring, funny, and exquisitely primitive, the reviewer risks losing readers’ trust. He is interested in being honest and adequate. In order not to be out of step with the public, the critic tries to convince him that his conclusions are not drawn from nowhere and deserve attention: he finds strong metaphors and gives clear arguments and illustrative examples. .

A few years ago, critics began looking for a place for their work in the Trades Cemetery. Social networks, where everything is discussed freely, quickly and directly, were supposed to bury it. Professional criticism has not disappeared, but it has lost its monopoly: alongside the reviews of respected publications that once determined the fate of films, books and restaurants, new platforms have sprung up where consumers directly share their impressions or criticize as they can. Critics have adapted: they have diversified formats, launched blogs, learned to create and maintain discussions on social networks. And although consumers, when making decisions, have started to pay more attention to likes, ratings and reviews from friends, they turn to the experts for an in-depth review.

What does the review do

Criticism has four main tasks: to understand – to form an idea of ​​the object and to describe it; evaluate – analyze the object according to specific criteria; find the positive and negative sides; suggest the best way to formulate the problem and propose its solution.

A neutral description and characteristic of what your text is about is also the necessary context for the reader to understand what it is about. Therefore, the introductory part is often formalized in reviews.

Is it possible to start the text with something more inviting, for example, to call the novel retrograde graphomania and waste of paper immediately? Yes, but let’s remember that the circulation of publishing houses is low, that there are few bookstores and that people buy and read very few books, so that neither the novel itself nor the short story of its publication did not reach the vast majority of readers. They run the risk of not understanding the text and being disappointed when reading the explanation of the seventh paragraph. You must be honest with the reader.

To be valid, all evaluations must be motivated. The point of the criticism is not that the author (didn’t) like it; otherwise, it might consist of two or three words and would be of interest to no one but the author and his mother (because mothers are interested in everything about their children). If we call the plot of a novel stupid, primitive, illogical, flat and superficial, we mean nothing to the reader.

Previous Adventurous travel for all ages
Next What you need to know if you want to try buy now, pay later